The Notre Dame loss on Saturday night was as ugly as any performance in the continued trend of big game meltdowns. It may as well have been a Bob Davie team getting pounded the Fiesta Bowl by Oregon State or a Charlie Weis squad getting drilled in the Sugar Bowl by LSU. You could actually insert any terrible performance from recent years in a big stage game, as they generally all look the same.
Saturday night featured a highly touted offensive line that couldn’t move the line of scrimmage and was referred to as “slow” throughout the broadcast by a seemingly delighted Kirk Herbstreit. Defensively, the Irish also appeared to be a step behind the Hurricanes. Miami controlled clock, ran the ball at will, and were very efficient in the passing game. The only area they had any difficulty was on 3rd down as they went just 2/13 however, they easily atoned for that by going 3/3 on 4th down.
The larger thought or question now is where does Notre Dame go from here? In another column a few weeks ago, I wondered was it better to go to a playoff game and get drilled or finish the season out of the mix but playing in a quality bowl game. My thought was that it would be better to finish the season strong and win a big bowl game against a quality opponent. Several people did not agree.
It is a question the Irish will not have to answer now.
A more important question for this week is can the Irish finish the season strong? Did Notre Dame peak really early, like say during USC week?
The buzzards will be circling this week not only from the Notre Dame haters of the world but from the fan base as well. Saturday night, Notre Dame fans on twitter were exiting the bandwagon quicker than those seeking lifeboats on the Titanic. Post-game analysis and articles today have questioned play calling, quarterback play, Kelly, etc.
To me, that is somewhat mind boggling.
The offense is allegedly predictable and Brandon Wimbush suddenly isn’t the answer at quarterback? Comments and analysis like this are totally useless in what was supposed to be a rebuilding season. Anyone that truly follows and analyzes Notre Dame knew this team had flaws. Two in particular were inexperience at the quarterback position and a defense that needed a complete rebuild. Both of those flaws were readily exposed on Saturday night.
The sense of loss is real because the Irish had so much in front of them. With two games and a bowl game remaining, the Irish need to regroup quickly as there is still a great deal for them to play for. Capping the season with two wins and bowl victory puts a great ribbon on a comeback season and keeps them on schedule for a rebuild that is apparently going to take longer than we had hoped.
bbd
November 13, 2017 at 11:52 amstop with the inexperience qb already, that’s horse hockey. he has now played in 7 games this season.
our offensive line sucked, wimbush has not learned to throw with touch, and the offense has no plays to counter a fast defense. the offense has no miss direction, quick hits, or screens to slow down the d.
take a look at what auburn did to Georgia.
Jimmyg
November 13, 2017 at 7:39 pmGoing to disagree. This is a 1st year quarterback. Aside from a decent Michigan State team, this was his first truly hostile environment game. They are tough. The line an have no explanation for, tough night. They did throw a few screens if I remember but the came later. I watched Auburn and Georgia (most of it). I took away that really good teams can get pounded when not ready to play!
Bill Madison
November 13, 2017 at 4:33 pmSince Holtz left, the Irish have fielded some good teams but not great teams. I tend to think they have been overrated in the polls throughout the years — evening during the 12-0 season — because “it’s good for college football.” If Kelly can keep his OC and DC a few more years and continue his role as a CEO instead of a meddling coach, I think the future could look good for the Irish. As for Wimbush, he should think about throwing darts during the off-season. It worked for Tony Rice back in ’88.
Jimmy grant
November 13, 2017 at 7:47 pmOnly to a point. Tony Rice completed just 48.5% for his career. However, he won with legs, leadership, and timely passing. No reason I see that Wimbush cannot be the same type of player. Polls not sure, I think they deserved to play for title in 2012. They were undefeated. Though that did not end well. I’ve been critical of Kelly at times, but this is a good turnaround especially if they win the last 2 and a bowl.
HolyHandGrenade
November 14, 2017 at 1:21 am2012 was as much a reflection of Alabama’s transcendent concentration of talent and coaching than their not deserving to be #2. They squeaked past many an opponent that year, but nothing pointed to the team not being able to pull that same plot against The Field. Bama being Tiger in that scenario.