Purdue week came to an end much like the end of a Russian Literature thesis defense, but with less inventive cheering or t-shirts. And The Bear’s panzer-like rush over the rest of the field just keeps chugging along. Help us, Bad Kermit. You’re our only hope.
| Expert | Previous Score | This Week | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sed | 95 | 20 | 115 |
| Sed’s Dog | 120 | 35 | 155 |
| The Bear | 180 | 40 | 220 |
| Dneelan | 120 | 10 | 130 |
| Bad Kermit | 170 | 20 | 190 |
| ChisND | 115 | 10 | 125 |
| domer.mq | 90 | 25 | 115 |
| Biscuit | 150 | 20 | 170 |
| JoeO | 30 | 30 | 60 |
Latest posts by domer.mq (see all)
- HLS Tweets for the Week of 2009-11-15 - November 15, 2009
- HLS Tweets for the Week of 2009-11-08 - November 8, 2009
- HLS Tweets for the Week of 2009-11-01 - November 1, 2009
I saw The Bear this past weekend and he said that he gets 30 points for picking an opponent over ND. what’s up with that? you should 10 only. i know there’s the negative penalty of -50 if you pick wrong, but the +30 is just an incentive to keep on picking against us. i vote for a change in the rules to +10 like every other game if you pick ND’s opponent, and keep the -50 if you’re wrong (traitor penalty).
BizKid.
That’s the way it’s been since we started the site. No changing the rules in the middle of the season. We’ll consider a rules change after the season. If Bear wants to sell his soul, that’s his prerogative.
The Commish.
Fine. But you suck.
My strategy goes like this: I am usually wrong in pick ’ems, therefore, if I pick ND to lose, I should be wrong and they will win. Unfortunately, I have not been wrong much this year.