<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How Will Brian Kelly Pull off a Two QB Offense?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/</link>
	<description>A Notre Dame Football Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: TERRY		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257765</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TERRY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257765</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257764&quot;&gt;Irish Elvis&lt;/a&gt;.

From Ryan&#039;s previous post I have been arguing one thing and one thing only - this team does NOT deserve to go to a bowl game. The fact that by virtue of having won 6 games it is entitled to go to one is meaningless to me. 



To repeat - I have not seen anyone make a serious argument that this team deserves to go to a bowl game. The ND administration could have refused a bowl invitation. Granted somewhere someone&#039;s feathers would have been ruffled, but - feces occur. 


Passing up some more practice time and an additional game - The defense is decimated and I wouldn&#039;t be surprised to see more injuries during practices and in the game. With a beat up defense what can be accomplished in practice if they can&#039;t go all out for fear of more injuries? I prefer to think of the team going home to be with their families at Christmas, then coming back to school in January. 


During winter workouts - think of the humiliation, the embarrassment of the USC game, wherein the ND coach publicly thanked the SC coach for not making the score any worse. Then do a few extra curls, run a few extra laps, let that sit in your gut for a while - for 9 months. Don&#039;t forget that the last NC came after a blowout loss to Texas A&#038;M the year before. (Yes I know that was in a bowl game.) 


Your point - &quot;neither &#039;entitlement&#039; nor &#039;deserving&#039; enter into the decision process&quot; sums up our disagreement in a nutshell. 


That&#039;s where we differ - They DO enter into MY decision process. 


Get it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257764">Irish Elvis</a>.</p>
<p>From Ryan&#8217;s previous post I have been arguing one thing and one thing only &#8211; this team does NOT deserve to go to a bowl game. The fact that by virtue of having won 6 games it is entitled to go to one is meaningless to me. </p>
<p>To repeat &#8211; I have not seen anyone make a serious argument that this team deserves to go to a bowl game. The ND administration could have refused a bowl invitation. Granted somewhere someone&#8217;s feathers would have been ruffled, but &#8211; feces occur. </p>
<p>Passing up some more practice time and an additional game &#8211; The defense is decimated and I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised to see more injuries during practices and in the game. With a beat up defense what can be accomplished in practice if they can&#8217;t go all out for fear of more injuries? I prefer to think of the team going home to be with their families at Christmas, then coming back to school in January. </p>
<p>During winter workouts &#8211; think of the humiliation, the embarrassment of the USC game, wherein the ND coach publicly thanked the SC coach for not making the score any worse. Then do a few extra curls, run a few extra laps, let that sit in your gut for a while &#8211; for 9 months. Don&#8217;t forget that the last NC came after a blowout loss to Texas A&amp;M the year before. (Yes I know that was in a bowl game.) </p>
<p>Your point &#8211; &#8220;neither &#8216;entitlement&#8217; nor &#8216;deserving&#8217; enter into the decision process&#8221; sums up our disagreement in a nutshell. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s where we differ &#8211; They DO enter into MY decision process. </p>
<p>Get it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Irish Elvis		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257764</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irish Elvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 15:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257764</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257763&quot;&gt;TERRY&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m just piecing some things together here...


1. less than 50, and within 25 points. So LSU 49, ND 24 is an acceptable bowl game score (notes for later)


2. The Emperor&#039;s New Clothes are sponsored by Under Armour, and that&#039;s quite a bit better than anything Adidas ever provided.


3. There may not be a good way to persuade any individual how to feel about a given team. Neither &quot;entitlement&quot; nor &quot;deserving&quot; enter into the decision process; a bowl game is the next game on the schedule. Michigan fans claimed to &quot;deserve&quot; a victory earlier this year due to bettering ND&#039;s total yardage, which is silly because it&#039;s points on the scoreboard that matter. Similarly, many fans felt ND was &quot;entitled&quot; to victory over FSU due to the controversial pass-interference penalty. Nevertheless, once that call was made, the teams proceed onward. ND plays a neutral site game every year -- one might say we&#039;re &quot;entitled&quot; to do so because of our independent status and national fan base; at its root, it&#039;s a game on the schedule, so we play it because we&#039;ve contracted to do so.


To take a longer view, eight of Notre Dame&#039;s 2015 opponents have qualified for bowl games. None of them have passed up the opportunity for practice time or an additional game. I&#039;d prefer for ND to stay off of a list that includes Temple, UMass, Wake Forest, and Virginia -- next year&#039;s opponents not attending bowl games.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257763">TERRY</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m just piecing some things together here&#8230;</p>
<p>1. less than 50, and within 25 points. So LSU 49, ND 24 is an acceptable bowl game score (notes for later)</p>
<p>2. The Emperor&#8217;s New Clothes are sponsored by Under Armour, and that&#8217;s quite a bit better than anything Adidas ever provided.</p>
<p>3. There may not be a good way to persuade any individual how to feel about a given team. Neither &#8220;entitlement&#8221; nor &#8220;deserving&#8221; enter into the decision process; a bowl game is the next game on the schedule. Michigan fans claimed to &#8220;deserve&#8221; a victory earlier this year due to bettering ND&#8217;s total yardage, which is silly because it&#8217;s points on the scoreboard that matter. Similarly, many fans felt ND was &#8220;entitled&#8221; to victory over FSU due to the controversial pass-interference penalty. Nevertheless, once that call was made, the teams proceed onward. ND plays a neutral site game every year &#8212; one might say we&#8217;re &#8220;entitled&#8221; to do so because of our independent status and national fan base; at its root, it&#8217;s a game on the schedule, so we play it because we&#8217;ve contracted to do so.</p>
<p>To take a longer view, eight of Notre Dame&#8217;s 2015 opponents have qualified for bowl games. None of them have passed up the opportunity for practice time or an additional game. I&#8217;d prefer for ND to stay off of a list that includes Temple, UMass, Wake Forest, and Virginia &#8212; next year&#8217;s opponents not attending bowl games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TERRY		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257763</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TERRY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 11:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257763</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257760&quot;&gt;Bayou Irish&lt;/a&gt;.

1) It is my real name
2) I heard the story years ago. I&#039;m not calling Kelly any of those names. 
3) My point is this - just because this team has won the required 6 games which &#039;entitle&#039; it to go a bowl game, after the Southern California embarrassment this team does not DESERVE to go to a bowl game - that has been my point all along .
In all the discussion I have seen about the upcoming game I do not recall one serious argument that this team deserves to go to a bowl game. 


We&#039;re &#039;entitled&#039;, therefore we go. That seems to be the new Notre Dame standard.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257760">Bayou Irish</a>.</p>
<p>1) It is my real name<br />
2) I heard the story years ago. I&#8217;m not calling Kelly any of those names.<br />
3) My point is this &#8211; just because this team has won the required 6 games which &#8216;entitle&#8217; it to go a bowl game, after the Southern California embarrassment this team does not DESERVE to go to a bowl game &#8211; that has been my point all along .<br />
In all the discussion I have seen about the upcoming game I do not recall one serious argument that this team deserves to go to a bowl game. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re &#8216;entitled&#8217;, therefore we go. That seems to be the new Notre Dame standard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryan Ritter		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257762</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Ritter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 00:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257762</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257761&quot;&gt;TERRY&lt;/a&gt;.

I watched the Disney movie. Does that work?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257761">TERRY</a>.</p>
<p>I watched the Disney movie. Does that work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TERRY		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257761</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TERRY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257759&quot;&gt;Ryan Ritter&lt;/a&gt;.

Read the story and get back to me]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257759">Ryan Ritter</a>.</p>
<p>Read the story and get back to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bayou Irish		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257760</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bayou Irish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 23:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257760</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257759&quot;&gt;Ryan Ritter&lt;/a&gt;.

Dammit, Ryan. That&#039;s a duLac violation on top of everything. What happened was Terry, if that&#039;s in fact his real name, just finished reading a collection of stories by H. C. Andersen and is applying one of those themes to our team: that Brian Kelly has been exposed as a sham, a fraud, a huckster, a charlatain. But seriously, if you look at our defense, even with the return of the guys we&#039;re getting back, we&#039;re going to be challenged to stop LSU&#039;s running game. That said, LSU broke 40 three times, but only against teams that are arguably (a lot) worse than ND is now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257759">Ryan Ritter</a>.</p>
<p>Dammit, Ryan. That&#8217;s a duLac violation on top of everything. What happened was Terry, if that&#8217;s in fact his real name, just finished reading a collection of stories by H. C. Andersen and is applying one of those themes to our team: that Brian Kelly has been exposed as a sham, a fraud, a huckster, a charlatain. But seriously, if you look at our defense, even with the return of the guys we&#8217;re getting back, we&#8217;re going to be challenged to stop LSU&#8217;s running game. That said, LSU broke 40 three times, but only against teams that are arguably (a lot) worse than ND is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryan Ritter		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257759</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Ritter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257759</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257758&quot;&gt;TERRY&lt;/a&gt;.

Both QBs are going to be naked? I don&#039;t follow.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257758">TERRY</a>.</p>
<p>Both QBs are going to be naked? I don&#8217;t follow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TERRY		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257758</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TERRY]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257758</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would be pleasantly surprised if LSU is held under 50 points. 


They won&#039;t be nice like USC and hold the score down - they will run up the score. 


This whole thing is more and more like the emperor&#039;s new clothes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be pleasantly surprised if LSU is held under 50 points. </p>
<p>They won&#8217;t be nice like USC and hold the score down &#8211; they will run up the score. </p>
<p>This whole thing is more and more like the emperor&#8217;s new clothes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Irish Elvis		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257757</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Irish Elvis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 18:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[it&#039;s a long-standing tradition that the most popular player is the backup quarterback. with the 2 QB situation, Brian Kelly may very well expose the flaws of Malik Zaire. WHY DO YOU HATE TRADITION, BRIAN]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s a long-standing tradition that the most popular player is the backup quarterback. with the 2 QB situation, Brian Kelly may very well expose the flaws of Malik Zaire. WHY DO YOU HATE TRADITION, BRIAN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jdthom1		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2014/12/17/will-brian-kelly-pull-off-two-qb-offense/#comment-257756</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdthom1]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=27458#comment-257756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So glad I checked your site today. 
#1 I agree, going that route Kelly is not trying to win the game and he has to understand the importance of beating an SEC giant like LSU in terms of recruiting, forward momentum, etc.  If it were Rutgers, maybe.
#2 Probably the route he goes but he has done that before with Rees/Hendrix and it didn&#039;t work.  The problem I think stems from the run game, which depends on a mobile QB regardless of who is taking snaps. With Golson in, defenses play the way they have since Purdue and don&#039;t really acknowledge Golson as an option run threat, leaving a defender unblocked. Plus I&#039;d like to see Zaire air it out more than he did against USC if he plays. 
#3 Agree. Such a unique situation in 2012
#4 AGREE. I am rooting for this, at least for the bowl game. It solves the problem with the run game with Golson in the game I mention above and would be tons of fun to watch. I have thought the solution could be having Folston/McDaniel or Folston/Bryant in the backfield at once but this would be even better.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So glad I checked your site today.<br />
#1 I agree, going that route Kelly is not trying to win the game and he has to understand the importance of beating an SEC giant like LSU in terms of recruiting, forward momentum, etc.  If it were Rutgers, maybe.<br />
#2 Probably the route he goes but he has done that before with Rees/Hendrix and it didn&#8217;t work.  The problem I think stems from the run game, which depends on a mobile QB regardless of who is taking snaps. With Golson in, defenses play the way they have since Purdue and don&#8217;t really acknowledge Golson as an option run threat, leaving a defender unblocked. Plus I&#8217;d like to see Zaire air it out more than he did against USC if he plays.<br />
#3 Agree. Such a unique situation in 2012<br />
#4 AGREE. I am rooting for this, at least for the bowl game. It solves the problem with the run game with Golson in the game I mention above and would be tons of fun to watch. I have thought the solution could be having Folston/McDaniel or Folston/Bryant in the backfield at once but this would be even better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
