<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Snap Judgment: Michigan	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/</link>
	<description>A Notre Dame Football Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 01:59:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: macgregor		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255161</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[macgregor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 01:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21670#comment-255161</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255158&quot;&gt;irishize&lt;/a&gt;.

no.  no no no.  nope and wrong.
come ON... Seriously?  I have been a fan since before the 77 season and THIS is the thing that most makes me want to cover my head in a bag.  Enough with &quot;The World is Picking on Us&quot; chorus, men.  I&#039;ve been hearing it for years and it needs to stop.  Every time we go on the road, every time we have a call not go our way, half of our fanbase sound like children crying to momma.  Show some grit.
  
If there were 7 bad or missed calls, MAYBE four went their way and three went ours, but it was close.  And any errors were just that:  errors.  NOT some huge conspiracy on the part of the &quot;FITB Conference Here.&quot;

Just like Alabama... we were beaten by a better team.  Their QB was better, their WR (at least one) was MUCH better, their D was better... and they played with direction and fire.  You might even say we were outcoached but I don&#039;t know.  (???)  No doubt about this though:  we needed someone to step up... like Gallon did, like Gardner did,... and no one stepped up and stayed stepped up.  And, just sayin, our key player on D (JUST LIKE AGAINST BAMA) wasn&#039;t there.  Fizzled.  Non-factor.  Negated.  Had Gardner not made the bungle of his young career, Tuitt would have been unheardfrom too.  Refs schmefs.

As far as Tommy&#039;s stats... THAT is what QB stats look like when a D is playing back, playing soft, playing bend but don&#039;t break.  No surprises. Under those circumstances, he could have thrown the ball all night... but if he didn&#039;t outplay/outscore Gardner, we were done.  You don&#039;t wanna blame Turnover Tommy?  OK, he hung 23 points on one of the best (THE best?) teams in the BigHowevermany when he needed to hang 35 and still have help from his D.  Lead us to a win???  TOMMY?!?!  Oh, he&#039;ll lead us to a win... and a few losses too.
He&#039;ll look brilliant against Purdue &#038; MSU, though.  

Go Irish!  Now, let&#039;s man the eff up!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255158">irishize</a>.</p>
<p>no.  no no no.  nope and wrong.<br />
come ON&#8230; Seriously?  I have been a fan since before the 77 season and THIS is the thing that most makes me want to cover my head in a bag.  Enough with &#8220;The World is Picking on Us&#8221; chorus, men.  I&#8217;ve been hearing it for years and it needs to stop.  Every time we go on the road, every time we have a call not go our way, half of our fanbase sound like children crying to momma.  Show some grit.</p>
<p>If there were 7 bad or missed calls, MAYBE four went their way and three went ours, but it was close.  And any errors were just that:  errors.  NOT some huge conspiracy on the part of the &#8220;FITB Conference Here.&#8221;</p>
<p>Just like Alabama&#8230; we were beaten by a better team.  Their QB was better, their WR (at least one) was MUCH better, their D was better&#8230; and they played with direction and fire.  You might even say we were outcoached but I don&#8217;t know.  (???)  No doubt about this though:  we needed someone to step up&#8230; like Gallon did, like Gardner did,&#8230; and no one stepped up and stayed stepped up.  And, just sayin, our key player on D (JUST LIKE AGAINST BAMA) wasn&#8217;t there.  Fizzled.  Non-factor.  Negated.  Had Gardner not made the bungle of his young career, Tuitt would have been unheardfrom too.  Refs schmefs.</p>
<p>As far as Tommy&#8217;s stats&#8230; THAT is what QB stats look like when a D is playing back, playing soft, playing bend but don&#8217;t break.  No surprises. Under those circumstances, he could have thrown the ball all night&#8230; but if he didn&#8217;t outplay/outscore Gardner, we were done.  You don&#8217;t wanna blame Turnover Tommy?  OK, he hung 23 points on one of the best (THE best?) teams in the BigHowevermany when he needed to hang 35 and still have help from his D.  Lead us to a win???  TOMMY?!?!  Oh, he&#8217;ll lead us to a win&#8230; and a few losses too.<br />
He&#8217;ll look brilliant against Purdue &amp; MSU, though.  </p>
<p>Go Irish!  Now, let&#8217;s man the eff up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: irishize		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255158</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[irishize]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21670#comment-255158</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think we have a foretaste of how ACC refs are going to treat us in our future ACC matchups in football, as well as basketball. We are the red-haired, Catholic stepchild and will be treated accordingly.
There was no way that the ACC crew was going to let us out of the Big House with a &quot;W&quot;. You just don&#039;t make that PI call against Bennett Jackson, especially late in the 4th quarter. It was an interception and would have given Tommy a chance to lead us to a win, something Tommy would have done two years earlier, if the defense didn&#039;t melt down in the waning seconds.
What a shame!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we have a foretaste of how ACC refs are going to treat us in our future ACC matchups in football, as well as basketball. We are the red-haired, Catholic stepchild and will be treated accordingly.<br />
There was no way that the ACC crew was going to let us out of the Big House with a &#8220;W&#8221;. You just don&#8217;t make that PI call against Bennett Jackson, especially late in the 4th quarter. It was an interception and would have given Tommy a chance to lead us to a win, something Tommy would have done two years earlier, if the defense didn&#8217;t melt down in the waning seconds.<br />
What a shame!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: canuck75		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255135</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[canuck75]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 14:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21670#comment-255135</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good sound analysis. I hate Michigan as much as anyone, but to my eye, it appeared that they played perfect (with a bit of help from our D). And when a team is close to perfect, then it is probably their day.  Is there any doubt in most minds that if the first PI goes our way, we have the ball down 34-30 and then matter of factly score? I swear, my first thought after the interception was &quot;we can&#039;t score too quickly...&quot;
I am surprised at Tommy&#039;s bad interception, but he was otherwise pretty solid.
All our opponents look weaker than they did when we first looked at the schedule, with USC and MSU looking absurdly weak at the moment.
Lets run the table and play Stanford with something very meaningful on the line.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good sound analysis. I hate Michigan as much as anyone, but to my eye, it appeared that they played perfect (with a bit of help from our D). And when a team is close to perfect, then it is probably their day.  Is there any doubt in most minds that if the first PI goes our way, we have the ball down 34-30 and then matter of factly score? I swear, my first thought after the interception was &#8220;we can&#8217;t score too quickly&#8230;&#8221;<br />
I am surprised at Tommy&#8217;s bad interception, but he was otherwise pretty solid.<br />
All our opponents look weaker than they did when we first looked at the schedule, with USC and MSU looking absurdly weak at the moment.<br />
Lets run the table and play Stanford with something very meaningful on the line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Department of Toad (@T0_Dd)		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255132</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Department of Toad (@T0_Dd)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2013 20:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21670#comment-255132</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255127&quot;&gt;NDtex&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree that Rees is not the problem, or not the whole problem. He can&#039;t do what Golson could do, but he played well enough. The offense really missed Riddick last night. All of those passes that bounce off of Atkinson&#039;s hands were completions when Riddick was here. The defense obviously missed Te&#039;o a great deal, not just in terms of his playmaking but also his leadership and on-the-field coaching from the MLB spot. Plus, Gardner just made some amazing plays. 

I am not sure what to say to anyone who thinks Hendrix is the answer. I have watched every snap he has taken and I have never seen anything that gave me confidence that he is an adequate backup, much less a better starter than Rees. That&#039;s just wishful thinking.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255127">NDtex</a>.</p>
<p>I agree that Rees is not the problem, or not the whole problem. He can&#8217;t do what Golson could do, but he played well enough. The offense really missed Riddick last night. All of those passes that bounce off of Atkinson&#8217;s hands were completions when Riddick was here. The defense obviously missed Te&#8217;o a great deal, not just in terms of his playmaking but also his leadership and on-the-field coaching from the MLB spot. Plus, Gardner just made some amazing plays. </p>
<p>I am not sure what to say to anyone who thinks Hendrix is the answer. I have watched every snap he has taken and I have never seen anything that gave me confidence that he is an adequate backup, much less a better starter than Rees. That&#8217;s just wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: @michianacomedy (Mike Marchand '01)		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255130</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@michianacomedy (Mike Marchand '01)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2013 17:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21670#comment-255130</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gardner&#039;s numbers throwing to everyone but Jeremy Gallon: 8 completions, 110 yards, 1 TD, 1 almost incomprehensibly stupid INT,  Gallon was a monster.  Gardner wasn&#039;t as good, or as frightening, as Denard Robinson was in 2011.

The big problem was the D.  As noted, the offense did enough (though they scored 23 points, not 30).  Last year, the offensive gameplan was generally get to 13 and wait for the D to work like a boa constrictor, suffocating and swallowing opposing offenses whole.  But without the leadership of Manti Te&#039;o, Kapron Lewis-Moore, Danny Spond et al the unit seems rudderless.  It&#039;s also clear that the front seven isn&#039;t dominant enough to cover for the inadequacies of the secondary.  Jeremy Gallon isn&#039;t Calvin Johnson.  Part of the reason why opposing QB&#039;s look so good is because their receivers can get consistent separation.

REES. IS. NOT. THE. PROBLEM.  He made one bad throw at the half and another in a desperate situation at the end of the game.  It&#039;s not as if replacing him for this year will do any good, because Golson is the quarterback next year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gardner&#8217;s numbers throwing to everyone but Jeremy Gallon: 8 completions, 110 yards, 1 TD, 1 almost incomprehensibly stupid INT,  Gallon was a monster.  Gardner wasn&#8217;t as good, or as frightening, as Denard Robinson was in 2011.</p>
<p>The big problem was the D.  As noted, the offense did enough (though they scored 23 points, not 30).  Last year, the offensive gameplan was generally get to 13 and wait for the D to work like a boa constrictor, suffocating and swallowing opposing offenses whole.  But without the leadership of Manti Te&#8217;o, Kapron Lewis-Moore, Danny Spond et al the unit seems rudderless.  It&#8217;s also clear that the front seven isn&#8217;t dominant enough to cover for the inadequacies of the secondary.  Jeremy Gallon isn&#8217;t Calvin Johnson.  Part of the reason why opposing QB&#8217;s look so good is because their receivers can get consistent separation.</p>
<p>REES. IS. NOT. THE. PROBLEM.  He made one bad throw at the half and another in a desperate situation at the end of the game.  It&#8217;s not as if replacing him for this year will do any good, because Golson is the quarterback next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NDtex		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NDtex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2013 15:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21670#comment-255127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255125&quot;&gt;RW&lt;/a&gt;.

Firstly, Rees was not the reason this game was lost. Period.

Second, Kelly&#039;s offense is not predicated around a running QB. ND put up 543 yards last week and 410 this week. They are moving the ball just fine.

I wasn&#039;t thinking national championship with this team, but it wasn&#039;t because of Rees. We lost a hell of a player in Te&#039;o and that loss seems to be greater than expected based on the way the defense played last night.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255125">RW</a>.</p>
<p>Firstly, Rees was not the reason this game was lost. Period.</p>
<p>Second, Kelly&#8217;s offense is not predicated around a running QB. ND put up 543 yards last week and 410 this week. They are moving the ball just fine.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t thinking national championship with this team, but it wasn&#8217;t because of Rees. We lost a hell of a player in Te&#8217;o and that loss seems to be greater than expected based on the way the defense played last night.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RW		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/09/08/snap-judgment-temple-2/#comment-255125</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RW]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2013 14:03:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21670#comment-255125</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Rees lack of athleticism actually thwarts the effectiveness of an offense predicated on the athleticism of the Qb. I don&#039;t get Kelly&#039;s thinking. Is it keep Rees in to win against the have nots and who cares if we get down a couple of scores against the upper tier teams cause its good to look valiant trying to win, rather than actually winning? Anyone thinking national championship with Rees? Then put athlete Hendrix in. it&#039;s his time because maybe....... There are no maybes with Rees.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rees lack of athleticism actually thwarts the effectiveness of an offense predicated on the athleticism of the Qb. I don&#8217;t get Kelly&#8217;s thinking. Is it keep Rees in to win against the have nots and who cares if we get down a couple of scores against the upper tier teams cause its good to look valiant trying to win, rather than actually winning? Anyone thinking national championship with Rees? Then put athlete Hendrix in. it&#8217;s his time because maybe&#8230;&#8230;. There are no maybes with Rees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
