<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Temple Preview: Reesus Cleans House	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/08/29/temple-preview-reesus-cleans-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/08/29/temple-preview-reesus-cleans-house/</link>
	<description>A Notre Dame Football Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:11:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=5.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bayou Irish		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/08/29/temple-preview-reesus-cleans-house/#comment-255009</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bayou Irish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21520#comment-255009</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Trey. Thanks for reading and for commenting. Hence, my score prediction. While I don&#039;t discount our ability to cock the game up and eek out a nail-biter in triple OT or lose it outright, I just think we&#039;ve moved on from 2010 and 2011 and 2012 as a program. Further, Temple isn&#039;t Purdue or Pitt. While I don&#039;t see Tuitt or Big Lou playing four quarters, I don&#039;t see how Temple handles Kona. Simply put, we have more and better bodies on the line, on either side, than they do. And that&#039;s going to have its effect, regardless of how much passion this parliament of winged warriors puts forth. Then you look at their secondary, and it&#039;s a question. I really think we could have five or more sacks on the day and that things could get really, really ugly for the Owls really, really fast.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Trey. Thanks for reading and for commenting. Hence, my score prediction. While I don&#8217;t discount our ability to cock the game up and eek out a nail-biter in triple OT or lose it outright, I just think we&#8217;ve moved on from 2010 and 2011 and 2012 as a program. Further, Temple isn&#8217;t Purdue or Pitt. While I don&#8217;t see Tuitt or Big Lou playing four quarters, I don&#8217;t see how Temple handles Kona. Simply put, we have more and better bodies on the line, on either side, than they do. And that&#8217;s going to have its effect, regardless of how much passion this parliament of winged warriors puts forth. Then you look at their secondary, and it&#8217;s a question. I really think we could have five or more sacks on the day and that things could get really, really ugly for the Owls really, really fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: trey		</title>
		<link>https://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2013/08/29/temple-preview-reesus-cleans-house/#comment-255007</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[trey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 16:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/?p=21520#comment-255007</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You have to put a WR to guard Tuitt, but naturally he&#039;d be blown away by strength. You could put a guard on him, but he&#039;d blow by that as well. You can try to chip him, but that means Irish Chocolate running free. Good luck with this conundrum]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have to put a WR to guard Tuitt, but naturally he&#8217;d be blown away by strength. You could put a guard on him, but he&#8217;d blow by that as well. You can try to chip him, but that means Irish Chocolate running free. Good luck with this conundrum</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
