ND Should Go Bowling
The Biscuit - 7:19 pm
…assuming a decent option becomes available.

the dude says: “STFU Donny, and let’s roll.”
Why?
1. Money. After buying Charlie out, and hiring whoever, we’re gonna need some cash baby! Not like it’d be anything more than a drop in the bucket compared to what we pay Charlie and the new coach, and it’d be nothing compared to the funding we have on-hand, but hey, every bit counts. This assumes we can find a bowl that’s a net positive from a financial standpoint obviously.
2. Get this taste out of our mouths. Ending on a 4-game losing streak, the changeover, etc just doesn’t sit well with anyone. Even those that wanted change don’t like the process, and nobody likes to lose. A win would be a nice way to finish things off. The Hawaii game clearly served this purpose last year.
3. Give the seniors one more game. They’ve worked hard and have been through a pretty crappy year. It’d be nice to give guys a shot to leave the program on a high note.
4. Give Jimmy and Golden one more game (and us one more chance to watch them). We know it’s likely that this is their last year. Plus, they’re both close to eclipsing a couple more records, and these guys are just awesome to watch.
5. Recruiting. Going to a bowl shows that there’s fight in this program, fight in this team, despite all the drama. That will be reassuring to some recruits, and could help keep them in the fold. It won’t be a sole reason, but it can help.
6. It would be fun to see an Ianello-run team take the field, and see what goes down.
7. We’re Notre Dame. We’re not a great program right now, but since when do we back down from a fight, a challenge, a game? I think the answer should be never. So let’s suit up and go bash some heads.
I know it’s a bit messy when there’s a new coach coming in. And we may or may not have the guy on campus by a Bowl game, and that could certainly impact things as well. But hey, it’s worked before. I say we go for it, and get this turnaround started early.
SDI
Biscuit–agree with a lot of what you said. But the idea of an uninspired ND team playing with Ianello calling plays, and probably losing to some MAC team with much more motivation, does not sound fun to me. For all his warts, CW’s game planning and play calling were the best thing going for this team (considering how atrocious the D typically is).
December 1, 2009 at 7:25 pmRemove CW from the equation, and you’ll likely see an ineffective offense and a bad D = blowout embarrassing loss.
The Biscuit
SDI, I get the missing CW part, but I don’t know that they’d be uninspired. I think the opposite. But the concerns of having someone else calling plays is a serious one.
December 1, 2009 at 7:35 pmdomer.mq
Given our current arrangement with the BCS, I don’t see any financial pluses to going to a minor bowl that pays out less than it costs to send a team to the game.
I’m sort of past the “taste” now that Weis is out.
I’m almost certain Tate and Jimmy want nothing to do with any activity that might physically harm them between now and April 2010.
The recruiting thing only works if it’s a non-sucky bowl and we have a HC.
We’ve elected not to go to bowl games in 96 and 82.
December 1, 2009 at 8:47 pmOldAlum
I guess you could bring CW back for a “swan song,” but really, what would a bowl prove? It would be a financial disaster.
Let’s just concentrate on recruiting and build a winner next year. It’s time.
December 2, 2009 at 12:10 pmThe Biscuit
We could roll to Detroit for a total cost of a few grand and come back with three quarter of a million. That’s not bad ROI if the finances are a concern.
December 2, 2009 at 7:24 pm