Nah nah na. Nah nah na.

That’s JD trying to sing the SportsCenter theme song in last night’s Scrubs. Yes, the show is dying a slow, horrible death, but that bit was fun-ny.
Anyway, in our own play-by-play, we’ll bring you the highlights from Charlie’s Press Conference today. Click on over to UND to watch it in its entirety, or just get the big nuggest here, from your friendly HLS!
(no this is not from today, but do you really think it matters?)
Chuck kicked it off today with a nice summary of the objectives of the Spring and then took some questions. From the important (”How many votes does Maura get?”) to the moronic (”When do you and Bill go on tour Charlie?”). Notice that both of those are moronic. Who ARE these press guys? (I don’t care if the guy that asked one of those is a ‘good’ reporter. If this is the type of thing they like to ask, I shame them publicly.) I digress…
Charlie’s Big Four Objectives for the Spring
Chaz walked us through his Spring plan, and while the overarching theme has to be ‘do whatever it takes to win and save my not-so-tiny @$$, the details are laid out in the PC as well.
- Get the new coaches meshing together and with the team. With The Duche, Alford and Hart on board, they need to build some chemistry, and that has to happen sooner rather than later for this team to be successful.
- Fix The Running Game (and other areas of identified focus). Charlie really mentioned ‘fixing problems’ here, but used the Running Game as the example. But really, fixing the running game is the single biggest issue this team has (followed closely by stopping opponents’ Running Games). I also put more emphasis on this one example because that’s what Chuck needs to do. Bear with me here while I rant on Charlie a bit, and what I think might be one of his biggest problems as a coach: Charlie is super-analytic. After a season, they break down what went right and what went wrong. They know the numbers and the players and blah blah blah. And that’s great, I think it’s great to know those things and be informed. But sometimes, I think Charlie just gets BURIED in the details. In the numbers, in the specific plays. Sometimes the answer isn’t in plugging all the holes in the damn. At some point, there’s too many holes and you need to either 1) get the F out of there or 2) build a new damn. I don’t know if Charlie gets the big picture through all the micro-focused analyses he does. I sure hope he gets it, and I believe he can. Since 2007, it feels like he’s just been plugging holes to keep the water back. I’m hoping that this Spring he can get that new damn up.
- Outright Competition – I like this one. In the recent past there hasn’t been a lot of this in Spring. Players either fell into starting roles because there wasn’t much competition, or we were just trying to get healthy, somewhat-athletic bodies on the field. This year, there are players pushing for time. And finally, not all of them are frosh. We have battles across both sides of the ball, from skill to line to special teams positions. This is good.
- Maturing/Finishing. Needless to say, this team wasn’t mature last year (see my million posts on youth) and this team didn’t know how to finish (see: most of our losses last Fall). Getting this team to mature mentally, and as a team, is big. Finding the ‘leaders of the leaders’ as Charlie said is important. Frosh can’t act or play like Frosh anymore – that year hiatus is over. No more vacation and no more excuses. It’s time to play and act like an upperclassman, even if you’re not. I’m looking at you Trevor Robinson, Hafis Williams, KLM, Brandon Newman, etc etc etc.
Charlie is Freaking Ready to Go
You could sense his anxiousness to get started. He’s hating the wait. He’s hating having to do his first two days sans pads due to NCAA restrictions, and he hates that he only has 11 full pads practices outside the B-G game. Charlie wants to get this ship righted, and he wants to get out there on the field NOW.
I’m Coming Out of the BOOOOOOOTH-A!
Despite my advice (I see how it is Chuck), Charlie is staying on the sidelines this year. At least to start. Charlie has a strong penchant for going to ‘guys he trusts’ for advice on lots of things. And I think that’s a good thing in general. But, for something like this, it just doesn’t make sense to do so. He went around to a bunch of guys that coach from the sideline and essentially asked “Hey Trusted Friend and Advisor that Coaches from the Sideline But Doesn’t Call the Offensive Plays, where should I coach from? The sideline, like you? Or up in the booth?” What do you THINK they’re going to say Chuck? “Yeah, I’ve never done it, but you should go in the booth!” Never.
Duh.
Chuck, I get the advice thing and I like that you reach out to experts and trusted friends and stuff. But your situation is unique. Now, if those guys had 2 bum knees, were calling the offensive plays, and had their jobs on the line, I’d say great, good job asking them. But you’re dealing with a whole different set of circumstances here man, you should’ve come to HLS for the call.
So I don’t like Charlie’s reasoning that the ‘vast majority’ said to be on the sideline, but I don’t mind the decision all that much. Like I said in my post recommending the Booth, it was never clear cut in my mind, and I can see arguments from both sides. So, that’s that.
Good news is that Charlie will have Coach Ianello up there in the booth relaying coverages on a play to play basis, and Coach Parmalee, another veteran, will help relay down stunts/blitz packages/etc from series to series to help plan the next wave of attack. So at the least Chuck has some experienced go-to guys up there in the booth.
Blue Gold Coaches Announced
Berton Barry and Justin Tuck will be honorary coaches for the Defense, and Jeff Faine and Reggie Brooks will guest coach the O. Not quite as much flash in the names themselves outside of Tuck, but it’s cool to have 2 guys that recently played in the Super Bowl (suck it Barry, Steelers rule), and it’s great to have Faine back. Reggie works at ND so it’s not as much of a ‘wow’ factor, but still a great ND player/ambassador to have in the fold for the game.
Not a Split Back Set, But…
James Aldridge could end up playing a legit Fullback this Fall. Charlie’s going to give him a shot to beat out Armando and Robert and Jonas and Cierre, but if James isn’t #1 or #2 at HB, he’s going to get a shot to fight Paskorz for the FB position. Charlie knows James is getting relatively long in the tooth and he wants to use him if he can. I don’t know how I feel about James as a traditional blocking FB, but it would be great to have a legit running/receiving threat from 2 backs when we go to that set. It’ll keep the defense a little more honest and will allow for some flexibility in the play calling that wasn’t there with Schwapp back in the house. That said, Paskorz was a high caliber HB in high school, so the Irish could have that kind of flexibility with him back there as well. We shall see how it unfolds this Spring/Summer.
The Defense Switch That Wasn’t
Lots of hullabaloo about 3-4 vs 4-3 over the past few years, and it’s official that ND is moving back to the 4-3. That said, it’s not really much of a change. Some position names change, some guys bounce a foot or two around here or there, but really it’s the same thing. How?
Well, as CW explains, in a 4-3 your 4th down lineman is just replacing the Will LB on the weak side. So that Will is just putting his hand down and getting up there in the line. It’ll be a more athletic DE that might resemble a Will LB, so even the personnel decisions aren’t all that different.
So it’s different and the same all at the same time. Excellent.
Let Me Sidestep That Question There Okay?
The final highlight was the lack of one. Charlie was asked about his offseason analysis of the running game, and in particular the Zone Blocking Scheme. Essentially, he was asked “What the F went wrong?”. Charlie demurred on this one, saying it would take “20 minutes” to work through it. He offered to take the reporter through it all off-line (and I’m guessing at least partially off the record) to really address it in detail, but essentially Chuck was saying it was too complex to answer in a soundbite. And while that’s probably true, I’m guessing a lot of the answers wouldn’t be very kosher, so Chuck wants to keep them behind closed doors. Old coaches, Ol and RB players, scheme, etc all fit into it, and so he’s being careful here. That’s fine and we’ll all probably never get the 100% clear answer on the problems last year. But I honestly don’t care all that much – so long as they fix it this Fall.
Anything surprising? New? Weird? Holla back.
Share This