Over-Work Safety
domer.mq - 10:36 pm
After 2 games, Notre Dame is ranked #52 in the nation in defending the run. Meanwhile, Pat Haden and various Notre Dame fans talk quite a bit about the “productivity” of the starting Notre Dame safeties, David Bruton and Kyle McCarthy. Both Bruton and McCarthy are very good players, and anyone who’s ever competently observed football will agree that Bruton and McCarthy pass the ole’ “eyeball test.” They tackle very well, they cover a lot of ground, and they have made some of the biggest plays of the season thus far. And thank God they’re excellent at what they do because, well, they’re getting worked.
Here’s a fun data sheet! (Note, the plays credited to each player don’t quite match up with their tackle credits, partly because of special teams play, partially because numbers are just wacky.)
While becoming #52 against the run, ND has faced 57 carries by opponents (15 by SDSU and 42 by Michigan (sucks!)), and given up an average of 4.04 yards per carry. Now, here’s where you’ve got to note that, at this point anyway, the NCAA isn’t ranking rushing defenses by yards/carry but by average yards per game. It’s also worth noting that, when one of your two opponents only carries the ball 15 times for 80 yards, getting a low yards/game average is pretty trivial.
Now, during those 57 carries, Bruton and/or McCarthy have made a tackle, according to the NCAA play-by-play records, 20 times or 35% of the time. And that’s when I get a lump in my throat.
One of the possible mitigating factors here is the particular defense ND was usually playing against Michigan (sucks!). In that game, the usual base set involved just 2 linebackers, thus removing 2 of your typical rush defenders from the field. Great. But the average yards/rush in which the 2 safeties are involved is also pretty disconcerting. If Bruton is tackling a rusher, it’s typically after an 11 yard gain. If McCarthy tackles a rusher, it’s typically after an 8 yard gain.
Another possible mitigating factor could be the types of offenses ND has faced thus far. Both opponents played some version of the spread, with SDSU focusing on the pass and Michigan (sucks!) focusing on handing off the ball to Sam McGuffie. I freaking hate that kid, but I still don’t understand the spread attack well enough to venture forth here. I will say this though, gosh the term “cutback lanes” kept popping to mind when McGuffie was running the ball.
I haven’t done a terribly thorough analysis of where any “holes,” might be in the defensive front 7 causing these opportunities for so much defensive production on the part of the safeties, but I do find it interesting to take a look at the tackle numbers and note to whom a ton of tackles are not being credited. It’s hard to say if that average yards/defended carry in which Bruton and McCarthy are involved is high for safeties on rushing tackles. After all, the very name of the position implies that they’d be making plays deep in their defended territory. They’re the last defense. And I simply don’t have the time or the child-labor necessary to analyze “good” rushing defenses around the country. I recall that UCLA’s safeties were both quite excellent in run support in 2007, but that’s way back before they were giving up 59 points to BYU.
One last little interesting tidbit to help make that chili-dog you had for dinner particularly heart-burny tonight: Kyle McCarthy is currently ranked in a tie for 5th nationally in total tackle credits. David Bruton is tied for 20th. ND’s next ranked tackler? Mo Crum in a tie for 351st.

Hrm.
Mike
We’re about to play a pro-style offense this week for the first time this year, and we will have slightly different personnel on the field. Is our defense – or defensive coaches – better at defending those than the spread? I don’t know, but I am somewhat optimistic that Ian Williams will notch a lot of tackles on Saturday.
September 17, 2008 at 7:46 amThe Biscuit
Mike, I think it’ll be great to have Ian more involved in the defense. I personally think we’re better suited to match up against a pro style offense than we are the spread. We didnt do poorly against the spread, but i dont think it was in our coaches’ or our players’ comfort zone. We’ll see Saturday.
September 17, 2008 at 12:06 pmmark
I have not analyzed any stats to back this up, but I just have a gut feeling that having Ian, Darius Flemming (LB), and Ethan Johnson playing a lot in our front 7 does not bode well for our ability to stop the run or sack the passer. I know that many/most of the passes over the past two weeks were 3 step drops, but a good DE should get there sometimes quickly just by beating the OL, occasionally a NT might, and blitzing LBs should too from time to time. We are young everywhere, but the DL, where this all starts, is a definite weakness of this team. I think we can still win a lot of games, but I do not have high expectations of our run D this year.
September 17, 2008 at 12:35 pmTrey
I agree, Mark. The lack of traditional “sacks”(those not caused by tackling the QB for a loss while on a designed run) is very disconcerting. I dont know what we need to do in Tenuta’s blitz schemes, but I think it’s obvious by now that we either cant or refuse to do it.
September 17, 2008 at 12:38 pmThe Biscuit
it’s a great point mark. i think we have a lot of talent on the D-line, but it’s just so young. ian and ethan will be great, but they still need to develop physically and mentally. we’re definitely making do with a somewhat patchwork edition of the DL. my hope is that Tenuta/Brown can bring together a scheme that allows the LBs to really help out on the run D without exposing us to the short/middle passing game too much.
September 17, 2008 at 1:28 pmJim
Wonder what their run blitzes will look like. I think they have not been shown as yet in any detail. Also wonder what the defensive front 7 will look like both schematically and personnel wise. 3-4 or hybrid 4-3?
September 17, 2008 at 2:24 pmdomer.mq
Jim,
That’s a good question. You’d think with Ringer being the main threat, a 4-3 type setup would be preferred, but of our DEs, it might be fair to say they’re better at pass D, so maybe run the 3-4 to get Harrison Smith on the field. He’s got a nose for the ball, even as small as he is.
The blitzes have been a weird mix thus far. We probably haven’t shown much run blitzing, at least in terms of the usual gap-attack type blitzes you might expect. It’s sort of incredible the number of “stacks” we’ve run, or that’s what we called it in HS, where 2 blitzers go thru the same gap, hoping to overload the blocking back. That’s certainly not a run blitz.
September 17, 2008 at 3:16 pmMike
Not that it excuses the play against SDSU, but our defense was also on the field for the majority of the Michigan game, and their tackling did seem to get worse as they got more tired.
Also, Mark, I wouldn’t lump Ian Williams in with Ethan Johnson or Darius Fleming. He had a ridiculous number of tackles last season for the minutes he played, and more tackles at the line means fewer tackles for our safeties.
September 17, 2008 at 4:54 pmmark
The reason I lumped Ian Williams with the Frosh is that, while he had lots of tackles last year, especially for only starting a game or two, our run D was still terrible. Considering the number of tackles that Ian and Laws had, you would think we would have had a decent run D, so I am not sure how good Ian is at stopping someone at the line rather than 4 or 5 yards downfield in pursuit. While I think he will be great based on his performance last year, I am not sure that he is great yet.
September 18, 2008 at 11:29 amThe Biscuit
i think it’s a little of both to be honest. ian is a good, solid player (frosh AA last year). but he’s still young. our rush D wasn’t great last year for a lot of reasons – part of it being that we had a frosh playing a ton (as we do again this year) and part because our defense was ALWAYS on the field (bc of our weak offense). so we can’t say that Ian is great yet – i think we’ll be able to say it next year. like Ethan, he’s young and talented, but will develop more over the next 2 years.
September 18, 2008 at 12:19 pm