Profiles in Leadership
domer.mq
Today, we profile 3 men who lead by example, but what sort of example?
Name: Joe Paterno
Position: Head Coach, Football, Penn State University
Example of his Leadership: Recently, “Joe Pa,” was featured along with his football program, the one he’s been in charge of since before the dawn of the digital game clock, on an episode of ESPN’s Outside the Lines. In the expose, it was revealed that 17 PSU football players were charged with crimes since, wait for it, January 1, 2007. Not 1997. Not even 2005. 2007. This includes assault charges against 2 PSU players in connection with a campus fight. 9 of the charges have resulted in convictions. Joe Pa’s response to the expose? Well, apparently he said, “You Got a Good Looking Witch Hunt Here, Don’t You?” He also allegedly pressured school administrators to use a light touch in punishing his players. And you can bet Joe Pa knows a which hunt when he sees one, since he was present for the ones in Salem back in the day. Anyway, in an interesting example of “timing,” Joe Pa has booted one of the players charged in the previously mentioned fight along with another player who was involved in a previous fight. The question about the timing is, does this move come after the expose, or before more bad news?
Name: Kirk Ferentz
Position of Leadership: Head Coach, Football, University of Iowa
Example of his Leadership: Thanks largely to ESPN’s coverage of Penn State, the Hawkeye HC may be breathing a little easier knowing that the college football world’s attention has been distracted from allegations that he and Iowa leadership were, essentially, involved in a cover-up of a sexual assault perpetrated by Iowa football players upon an Iowa student on Iowa’s campus. Oh, yeah, I forgot the extra “allegedly”s in there, didn’t I? Well, here, have an allegedly as I remind you that 18 Iowa football players, past and present, have been arrested since April 2007 for stuff they allegedly did.
Name: Randy Shannon
Position of Leadership: Head Coach, Football, University of Miami
Example of his Leadership: When Coach Shannon was hired before last season, it was pretty clear that the university had hoped that he could bring a new level of honor to a program that was sorely lacking in it. Shannon was a no-nonsense sort of guy who took over the program with a firm hand and did unheard of things like demand his players not carry weapons and sign a “code of conduct.” And despite a 5-7 season last year, things were looking up for Shannon and the Hurricanes as Miami signed 33 recruits in a top-5 class this past winter. 33. A number that is a full 8 units of whatever you’re measuring above the NCAA allowed 25. So how did Shannon make them all fit in the class? Well, he just let the excess fall off. And why not, considering the “excess” happen to be relatively low-rated talents that Miami wont really miss all that much anyway. It was just nice having them as insurance just in case the “VHT”s, as Phil Steel might call them, didn’t manage to show up for the start of practice.
Somewhat related posts...
#5 Southern Cal: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 3. Average rank among all ballots: 5.33. A team with so much talent that the fact they return 4 starters on offense and 7 of defense just, well, doesn’t seem to matter. During the Pete Carroll era, the Trojans have redefined “reloading.” Still, with all that talent, Southern Cal has managed some really strange results, including losing to Stanford last year and an inept UCLA the year before. Teams that, at the time, had no business giving an elite program any problems. This season, they start
#4 Georgia: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 3. Average rank among all ballots: 5. Running back Knowshon Moreno is arguably the most talented back in the country, and surrounding him is the largest number of returning starters in the SEC. Knowshon ran for 1300+ yards last season and he wasn’t even a starter for the first 3 games. Meanwhile, the Bulldogs must play Florida, Auburn, LSU, and South Carolina on the road, but Mark Richt’s away-game winning percentage is 86%. Plus, they’ve got a very good QB in Matt Stafford, a defense stacked with talent that could match up against anyone in the country, and, thanks to HC Mark Richt’s own commitment to Special Teams excellence, one of the most consistently excellent special teams units in the country. Also of note, before the last game of 2006 (against GT) Richt turned over play calling duties to young (and apparently fertile) OC Mike Bobo. Why? Because
#3 Texas: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 2. Average rank among all ballots: 4. We’re always fascinated when we talk to a Texas fan or resident and hear that the relationship between HC Mack Brown and Horns fans is tenuous. How can that be the case for a guy that’s won a NC? Well, maybe it’s just that the fans realize that in a state as talent-rich as Texas, any decent coach should be able to win a NC, particularly when your QB is an unstoppable force of nature. As for Texas’ fortunes this year, the 2 things we really like are the capability of QB Colt McCoy when he’s not getting his spine checked out and what should be one of the top-5 offensive lines in the country. What we don’t like is that QB and OL practically make up the entirety of the returning starters on Brown’s roster. However, all of the first 5 weeks of the season lay out nicely for Texas as they take on Florida Atlantic, UTEP, Arkansas, and Rice before getting a bye week just before their first (probably) real test out of Colorado. That’s a full month and more to work out the kinks with new starters before their season really even begins. And given
#3 Florida: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 1. Average rank among all ballots: 4. Can a single man put a team in contention for a national championship? Yes, if that man is Tim Tebow. Get to know Mr. Tebow now, because he’s clearly setting himself up for a run at some high level government office many years from now after giving it a go in the pros as a linebacker.
#1 Oklahoma: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 1. Average rank among all ballots: 2.33. I’m sort of proud of this pick by HLS. It’s not, as far as I can tell, the sexy pick. Seems like Georgia fits that bill this summer. But there are elements to the Sooners this year that are tough for us to ignore. For starters, their QB (Sam Bradford) does not miss when he throws the ball. He completed 69.5% of his passes last year. And it’s not like he just threw 10-12 passes a game. The Sooners averaged 258 yards passing last year. And to protect the QB, Mike Stoops can line up the best offensive line in the country (there will be no argument about this until someone can prove it wrong with actual game play). In between all the hanging out in the pocket, completing passes for nice yardage, the Sooners like to mix it up here and there with a rushing game that averaged 191 yards/gm in 2007. And now, because of the new clock rules,
#15 Arizona State: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 11. Average rank among all ballots: 16.66. Returning the highest number of starters in the Pac-10, a team that started out 8-0 last season during what most expected to be a “rebuilding year,” now may have their sights set on contending for a national championship. Coach Dennis Erickson gave Sun Devil fans a whiplash of joy in his first year at the helm in Tempe, and there’s little reason to expect momentum to fall off in 2008, particularly with veteran signal-caller and potential-Pac-10-career-passing-yardage-record-holder
#14 Michigan State: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 9. Average rank among all ballots: 15.66. A vote for MSU seems to be a vote of confidence in 2nd year coach Mark Dantonio. After all, the Spartans did end up going 7-6 in 2007 after starting off 4-0. And, as Kirk Herbstreit so famously said, “That’s why they’re Michigan State.”
#14 BYU: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 9. Average rank among all ballots: 15.66. After leading the Cougars to an 11-2 season that nearly managed to really screw with the BCS system in 2007, Bronco Mendenhall must replace 8 starters on defense. Luckily, they need to replace just 1 starter on offense. Besides, using
#12 Wisconsin: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 6. Average rank among all ballots: 15.33. The Badgers have to like the way things are looking in the Big 10. Michigan is set up for a down/rebuilding year during a season when Wisconsin must match up against the Skunkbears and Ohio State in consecutive weeks. What probably looked like a brutal 3 weeks of games against Michigan, OSU, and PSU now seems like a time of real possibility to take command in the Big Televen, particularly since the badgers have nearly their entire team back from a 9 win, 2007 season. And while we get this gut feeling that HC Bret Bielema is probably areal S.O.B.,
#11 Virginia Tech: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 8. Average rank among all ballots: 12. This team went 11-3 in 2007 with losses to a #2 LSU (and eventual MNC), #2 BC, and #8 Kansas. They lose a bunch of guys in 2008, particularly on the defense, and HC Beamer is already talking about how there will be no QB controversy, which, as we all know, guarantees a QB controversy. Oh yeah, and they also
#10 Ohio State: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 2. Average rank among all ballots: 11.33. Ohio State looked mighty good last year right up until they collided with the buzzsaw that was LSU in the MNC game. Then they looked as bad as they looked in their previous MNC game. But hey, at least they were invited to the dance, right? This year, the Bucknuts look forward to replacing whoever was trying to replace Troy Smith at QB with all-everything, first-year-frosh Terrelle Pryor. We have to admit, it does sort of feel like OSU is up here in the top 10 simply by virtue of being king of the Big Televen hill until someone out there knocks them off. It does help a lot that they get to figure out their QB/passing-game while probable Heisman contender Beanie Wells runs over everything in his path. How many college football players are so loved as to earn
#9 Auburn: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 9. Average rank among all ballots: 11. What we like about Auburn is that, despite new offensive and defensive coordinators, and, a “new” offensive scheme, the Tigers return 15 very savvy starters - so savvy that we are forced to place “new” in “quotation marks,” because we saw what these guys can do with that “new” scheme and about a week of practice in the form of a season-high 423 yards of offense against Clemson in the Chick-fil-A Bowl. (Excuse me: Mmmmmmm…. Chick-fil-A……) We’ll take that as a solid preview of things to come in 2008 after a full Spring and Fall-camp. So long as they can overcome Tommy Tuberville’s annual mental-meltdown over the difficulty of SEC competition, the Tigers could well sneak up on an unsuspecting, lacking-in-current-game-film SEC.
#8 Missouri: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 5. Average rank among all ballots: 9.66. Having gone 12-2 last year and garnering a lot of attention for a program usually better known for almost beating Nebraska, these Tigers look to build on that momentum by returning 10 starters on defense and 2007 Heisman finalist
#7 Clemson: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 4. Average rank among all ballots: 9.33.
#6 LSU: Highest Position in a voter’s ballot: 1. Average rank among all ballots: 6. After Notre Dame played LSU in the 2007 Sugar Bowl, a lot of Irish fans thought the Tigers (seriously people, how about some creativity?) might be the best squad in the land, although we figured LSU would take a hit while trying to use a new QB in 2007. But it turned out we were only partly right. They didn’t have any trouble with a new QB at all. This year, after losing Flynn to graduation and Perilloux to the ATF or some other federal agency, 





