<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NCAA Releases Self-Invented Metric Results For Some Self-Back-Patting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/</link>
	<description>Just a few guys loving the same woman and talking Notre Dame Football.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:26:48 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: The cheaters list - Notre Dame Football Discussion &#124; Fighting Irish Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/comment-page-1/#comment-55330</link>
		<dc:creator>The cheaters list - Notre Dame Football Discussion &#124; Fighting Irish Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55330</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Her Loyal Sons » NCAA Releases Self-Invented Metric Results For Some Self-Back-Patting   __________________ HEED, turn down those Bay City Rollers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Biscuit</title>
		<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/comment-page-1/#comment-55297</link>
		<dc:creator>The Biscuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55297</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that&#039;s the one Mike.  Although ND falls just behind Rutgers in the APR/ARP/AAA whatever you call it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s the one Mike.  Although ND falls just behind Rutgers in the APR/ARP/AAA whatever you call it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike81</title>
		<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/comment-page-1/#comment-55285</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55285</guid>
		<description>Is this the same NCAA report the New York Times used to trash ND last week in that article about ND&#039;s &quot;arrogance&quot; in connection with the Rutgers series?  

&quot;On the ethical front, the team [the Rutgers Coach ] calls the athletic departmentâ€™s â€śflagshipâ€ť also scored last week in the N.C.A.A.â€™s Academic Progress Report, as one of six Bowl Subdivision colleges to be rated in the top 10 percent of the studyâ€™s four-year cycle. The other ones were Duke, Stanford, Rice, Air Force and Navy.
&#039;Good company,&#039; Mulcahy said.
Notre Dame excluded.&quot;

I wonder what Rutgers&#039;s graduation rate is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the same NCAA report the New York Times used to trash ND last week in that article about ND&#8217;s &#8220;arrogance&#8221; in connection with the Rutgers series?  </p>
<p>&#8220;On the ethical front, the team [the Rutgers Coach ] calls the athletic departmentâ€™s â€śflagshipâ€ť also scored last week in the N.C.A.A.â€™s Academic Progress Report, as one of six Bowl Subdivision colleges to be rated in the top 10 percent of the studyâ€™s four-year cycle. The other ones were Duke, Stanford, Rice, Air Force and Navy.<br />
&#8216;Good company,&#8217; Mulcahy said.<br />
Notre Dame excluded.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder what Rutgers&#8217;s graduation rate is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Biscuit</title>
		<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/comment-page-1/#comment-55268</link>
		<dc:creator>The Biscuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55268</guid>
		<description>I remember reading about how Purdue and a few other schools have already agreed to some set of prescribed processes so they wouldnt be put on the &#039;watch list&#039; or whatever.  I also love how this &#039;progress&#039; doesn&#039;t include anything to do with measurable things like grades, attendance or even not-breaking-the-law.  Classic NCAA BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading about how Purdue and a few other schools have already agreed to some set of prescribed processes so they wouldnt be put on the &#8216;watch list&#8217; or whatever.  I also love how this &#8216;progress&#8217; doesn&#8217;t include anything to do with measurable things like grades, attendance or even not-breaking-the-law.  Classic NCAA BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
