<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NCAA Releases Self-Invented Metric Results For Some Self-Back-Patting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/</link>
	<description>Just a few guys loving the same woman and talking Irish Football.</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 02:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The cheaters list - Notre Dame Football Discussion &#124; Fighting Irish Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55330</link>
		<dc:creator>The cheaters list - Notre Dame Football Discussion &#124; Fighting Irish Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 18:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55330</guid>
		<description>[...] Her Loyal Sons » NCAA Releases Self-Invented Metric Results For Some Self-Back-Patting   __________________ HEED, turn down those Bay City Rollers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Her Loyal Sons » NCAA Releases Self-Invented Metric Results For Some Self-Back-Patting   __________________ HEED, turn down those Bay City Rollers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Biscuit</title>
		<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55297</link>
		<dc:creator>The Biscuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55297</guid>
		<description>Yeah, that's the one Mike.  Although ND falls just behind Rutgers in the APR/ARP/AAA whatever you call it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, that&#8217;s the one Mike.  Although ND falls just behind Rutgers in the APR/ARP/AAA whatever you call it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike81</title>
		<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55285</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike81</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 16:34:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55285</guid>
		<description>Is this the same NCAA report the New York Times used to trash ND last week in that article about ND's "arrogance" in connection with the Rutgers series?  

"On the ethical front, the team [the Rutgers Coach ] calls the athletic departmentâ€™s â€śflagshipâ€ť also scored last week in the N.C.A.A.â€™s Academic Progress Report, as one of six Bowl Subdivision colleges to be rated in the top 10 percent of the studyâ€™s four-year cycle. The other ones were Duke, Stanford, Rice, Air Force and Navy.
'Good company,' Mulcahy said.
Notre Dame excluded."

I wonder what Rutgers's graduation rate is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this the same NCAA report the New York Times used to trash ND last week in that article about ND&#8217;s &#8220;arrogance&#8221; in connection with the Rutgers series?  </p>
<p>&#8220;On the ethical front, the team [the Rutgers Coach ] calls the athletic departmentâ€™s â€śflagshipâ€ť also scored last week in the N.C.A.A.â€™s Academic Progress Report, as one of six Bowl Subdivision colleges to be rated in the top 10 percent of the studyâ€™s four-year cycle. The other ones were Duke, Stanford, Rice, Air Force and Navy.<br />
&#8216;Good company,&#8217; Mulcahy said.<br />
Notre Dame excluded.&#8221;</p>
<p>I wonder what Rutgers&#8217;s graduation rate is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Biscuit</title>
		<link>http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55268</link>
		<dc:creator>The Biscuit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2008/05/06/ncaa-releases-self-invented-metric-results-for-some-self-back-patting/#comment-55268</guid>
		<description>I remember reading about how Purdue and a few other schools have already agreed to some set of prescribed processes so they wouldnt be put on the 'watch list' or whatever.  I also love how this 'progress' doesn't include anything to do with measurable things like grades, attendance or even not-breaking-the-law.  Classic NCAA BS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I remember reading about how Purdue and a few other schools have already agreed to some set of prescribed processes so they wouldnt be put on the &#8216;watch list&#8217; or whatever.  I also love how this &#8216;progress&#8217; doesn&#8217;t include anything to do with measurable things like grades, attendance or even not-breaking-the-law.  Classic NCAA BS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
