September 23, 2007

Another Postmortem: The “I Have Not Waved the White Towel” Edition


Not Quite Operational

Nor will I. Those idiotic white towels that some corporate sponsor handed out to 75,000 fans yesterday in Notre Dame Stadium. BGS wanted us all to kill this idea because it was infinitely stupid for a bunch of people in green shirts to be waving white towels while our team played Michigan State. If you didn’t have an appreciation for the horrific power of group-think, then you’d have though that ND fans wouldn’t participate in white towel waving and you’d be wrong. What I found dumber was filling the air with billions of particles of cheap towel lint while we all tried to scream our heads off in support of the team and the team tried to run at full speed. I tell you one thing: If I die of lung cancer or some weird pneumonia, remember that I never smoked, and be sure to sue whoever was involved with those towels in my name. (Note: I realize the towels were somehow tied to Charlie Weis’ “Hannah and Friends” charity. I just wish the corporate sponsors had just given money to the charity than spending money on cheap towels.)

Anyway, let’s get to “grading” the progress of this squad. As I said Friday, we “went back to basics” in our measurement of progress just as the team did. Here’s what the results look like:

  1. Tackle - Hmm. Even though this first criteria seems simple, there are circumstances within the game that make this one more difficult to judge. And certainly the least of those circumstances is not named Jehuu Caulcrick. I swear to God that man has 200 pounds of meat on his legs. It must be like trying to tackle 2 battering rams at the same time. Still, what worried me the most here is the overall technique, or lack thereof, being applied to tackling. There were plenty of attempts to hit a guy really hard and to wrap up, but angle of pursuit was often poor. Our middle linebackers (Mo Crum included) don’t seem to fully understand how to “fill a hole” (more on this later), and still after the initial pop and attempt to wrap up, the legs of a lot of tacklers went dead. ND isn’t good enough for that. ND needs to keep driving with their legs on a tackle until the whistle is blown. Fail
  2. Block - Obviously, the blocking by the line, TEs, backs, and wide receivers all improved. The wide receivers actually improved to near-Maurice Stovall levels of blocking. That’s really good. The O-Line showed us that they are, indeed, capable of creating holes. They’re still not capable of winning the line of scrimmage in a 3rd or 4th and short, however. Scwapp creamed somebody! I saw it! It happened right in front of me! But I’m still mystified as to why he plays so much. It’s not that he’s lacking heart or strength. He’s just a really, really stiff guy out there, and it’s easy for linebackers to juke him and still make a play. Fail
  3. Run - Oh boy, oh boy, oh boy, oh boy! Anyone else really excited to see Aldridge and Hughes looking really good as tough, rough runners with the ability to break a few runs for 20+ yards? Yeah. One thing Aldridge seems to have, which is a nice surprise, is excellent timing on his cuts relative to his lead blocks. A very limited number of guys can just run into a crowd and get beyond everyone (see also: Reggie Bush). Aldridge does a nice job of setting up his blocks, and just as the LBs have to commit to taking on the blocker, Aldridge makes a quick move to ruin whatever leverage or position the LB might have had. Pass
  4. Create the Violence - This was much improved. Neal and Smith are a ton of fun to watch because they look like all they live for is getting to whoever has the ball and creating a really unfortunate situation for that person. And Neal would have had even more success if MSU hadn’t figured out that the line judge on the MSU sideline wasn’t going to call holding even if the tackle had given Neal an atomic wedgie. Crum, when he did find his man (and he did that quite often) was popping guys as well as he could. Bruton hit everyone with quite a lot of force. Michael Turkovich, on one play, got his hands inside a OLB’s pads, drove him up into the air, and then landed on top of the guy with brilliant force. Don’t get me wrong, there’s still room to get much better, but this area also did get much better from last week. Pass
  5. Hustle - I heard a lot of things said in the stands yesterday (also more on this in a bit). And among those things I heard were criticisms that these guys came out flat and didn’t play with any heart. Those may have been valid criticisms in the first 3 games, but they were flat-out wrong in this game. These guys were playing to win during the entire game, and they were playing passionately. Pass
  6. Take Pride - This, naturally, plays into the previous goal. And it seemed pretty clear that these guys were giving it their all for themselves, the program, their fellow students, and the fans. Pass
  7. Win - Fail

Now, granted, we’ve sort of “lowered the bar” in measuring progress, but I think we can say that this team made some real progress over the previous week. So yay, moral victory! But it’s not good enough. Not by a mile. Not when you’re Notre Dame. And so this is no time to rest on some moral laurels. It’s time to take the progress that was made last week and apply it as a foundation for even more progress this week. And it’s time to learn to win.

Anyway, now for a lot of thoughts that I’m not sure how to string together coherently without the clever use of bullet points:

  • ND Fan Knowledge: Like I said above, there were a lot of comments being made in the stands that would indicate that “they” were all watching a much different game than I was. Was I frustrated? Of course! I want to win, dammit. But I realize that this team is very young and has a lot to learn. I’ve also come to realize that there are an awful lot of people sitting in the stands who know crap about football. It’s actually hard for me to relate to, but that’s okay. It doesn’t make someone a bad fan for not knowing much about the game. Those people can cheer loudly and be passionate about the Irish simply for the fact that they love Notre Dame. They can still be excellent fans, but for the love of the woman standing atop the golden dome, some of you may want to consider what sort of tripe is spewing from your mouth about the game while in the stadium. Because the rest of us can hear you, and we’re laughing at you. There are a ton of knowledgeable ND fans. And there are many who are less knowledgeable but every bit as passionate. And then there are the one that don’t know that they don’t know.
  • Our Tackling Technique is Problematic: We talked last week about how, if your feet go dead, you can’t block anyone. Well, it’s also really difficult to tackle anyone. Essentially, in the game of football, if your feet go dead, you’re dead. Mo Crum is a great example of this. From my corner seat, I could see a lot of what he was seeing, and he “got to the hole” more than he “filled the hole.” He’d sort of sniff the play out, get to the right starting position, and then try to receive the ball carrier in the hole. Problem is, those big backs had a lot of momentum when Crum would receive them. And then the backs would get 5 yards after contact. It was killing us. The better approach would be for Crum to sniff out the play (which he does well), get in position (which he does well), and then before the ball carrier moves into the hole, attack the ball carrier. I’m not sure why this isn’t happening. It may be a problem of lateral movement. When the LB attacks the ball carrier, he needs to be able to adjust his body laterally while still being able to deliver a blow on the tackle (This is part of the reason why you always hear “keep your pads square” if you hang around linebacker coaches in practice.) I’m not sure Crum, with his added weight, feels like he can “flow” to the ball as well as he could. Sadly, without the added weight, he doesn’t match up real well as a middle linebacker.
  • How to throw on ND: Design a play called “Throw it at Lambert.” I know it’s not nice to throw a kid under the bus. He’s genuinely trying to play football. He’s also not looking for the football. This has to be corrected and it has to be corrected by the coaches.
  • Young Playmakers: It was really striking to see how the big plays of the game for ND were all being made by young guys. Either first-year starters or true freshmen/sophomores. It’s remarkable, really. Yes, some of the more senior guys played hard, most notably on defense, but the senior playmakers of last year, Quinn, Shark, Darius, etc… are being replaced with freshman and sophomore playmakers.
  • Fubmle-rooskie: I still haven’t gone back to look at the play on TV, but on the play that MSU scored on a pass after the QB looked to have fumbled the ball, if that wasn’t a “planned” fumble, it should have been. The entire defense converged toward the fumble, and it left the receiver wide open.
  • When I Stop Harping on This, We’ll Be Winning: Everyone has their thoughts on when the “turning point” in the game occurred. I’d say sometime in May of last year when the offensive leadership all graduated from Notre Dame. Don’t get me wrong, I admired Sullivan for playing thru some pain yesterday (even if it did rob us of a chance to cheer for Bemenderfer), but there’s still nobody in that offensive huddle that the rest of the team can look to when things aren’t going so well. And that’s why things turned around and the game got out of hand. If games were won just because one or two things went wrong, ND would have won this game after MSU’s early fumble and ND’s first TD of the year. But MSU had someone on that field holding the offense together. ND is still in search of that. Jimmy Clausen will need to be that person in the future. I’m hopeful James Aldridge may be able to be that person very soon.
  • Jimmy ain’t Jesus: That kid knows what he’s doing insofar as playing the game is concerned. He’s got all the physical tools and the mental tools too. What he needs to work on is reading his progressions at college speed, creating the necessary “internal clock,” and managing the huddle and cadence against the play clock. But even some of his incompletions were impressive because they were incomplete rather than intercepted. In other words, he gave his receiver a chance to catch the ball while giving the defender no chance at all.
  • Charlie ain’t Bill or Bill: It’s been interesting to watch Charlie during his press conferences lately. If Bill Parcells were in this situation, I don’t think he’d be making jokes. If Bill Belichick were in this situation, I’m not sure he’d even speak. Charlie’s a pretty cool hand, really. It’s interesting because it seems like a lot of fans expected, given his pedigree, to get a clone of Parcells when they got Charlie. But Charlie’s got his own personal style and, having seen it while he’s winning and, now, losing, I have to say I really appreciate it. It’s far more amiable than the Bills, and I think it will serve him well in the college ranks. That’s not to say he can’t shoot someone down in a hurry when he wants to, but it sure seems he at least aims his shots.

So, overall, we did see some progress. There’s a foundation there - something to build upon. Get the running game going, and that opens up the play-action passing. Get some play-action passing going, and suddenly those safeties can’t help defend the run. Before you know it, you’re in a wonderfully vicious circle.

It’s time to grow up a little more this coming week. Time to realize that one, two, or even a few bad plays can’t knock you out of a game if you don’t let them. And time for a leader, any leader, on offense to continue to emerge.

We’re going to continue looking at these same criteria next week, but we’ll add a few more as well. The football team has something to build on and so do we. I’m thinking we’ll look at things like 3rd Down Efficiency on both sides of the ball, 3rd and shorts on both sides of the ball, angle of pursuit, ball skills on the part of the defense, and line of scrimmage technique by the wide receivers.

Related Posts:

September 21, 2007

Measuring Progress: The Lego Duplo Edition

For the past few weeks, we’ve been trying to find signs of progress in the play of the Notre Dame Football Team. And, frankly, it hasn’t been a very encouraging endeavor. Getting blown out by Georgia Tech was rough. Getting run over by Penn State was terrible. And getting shutout completely by Michigan (sucks!) well, that just sucked about as much as Michigan (sucks!). This week, Notre Dame faces Michigan (sucks!) State in a battle of the polar opposites. MSU has a brand new coach, a lot of momentum, and a 3-0 record. Notre Dame has a 3rd year coach, less momentum than a stationary ping pong ball, and an 0-3 record. Obviously, things are looking pretty dire for ND right now.That said, Charlie Weis has decided to go back to the beginning, back to basics, and fix what ails Notre Dame before even worrying about MSU. And in that same spirit, we’ve reverted our signs of progress back to the absolute basics.

The Lego Duplo Basic Signs of Progress

  1. Tackle - This is football, a contact sport. And a primary piece of this sport is tackling. Real, genuine, shoulder to the gut, head on the ball, wrap up, drive-thru tackling. The Notre Dame defense seems to be in love with ball-stripping. We can’t imagine that the players are coached to strip first and then try to tackle someone, but that’s the way the players have been playing.
  2. Block - Hit somebody. Anybody in a differently colored jersey will suffice. Explode off the ball, drive your legs and your hips, hit through the defender, continue until the whistle is blown. Don’t take the hit, deliver it. Bring the fight to them.
  3. Run - If there’s a hole, run through it, no matter if it’s the hole that was supposed to be there based on the play called in the huddle. If there isn’t a hole, become the aggressor. Again, don’t take the hit, deliver it. Let the opposition know that if they’re going to play this game, they’d better earn the right to play it.
  4. Create the Violence - A common theme in the first 3 objectives. Football is a game of athletic ability, strategy, and will. Show a greater will than the opponent. Make them bow down to you. Even if the plays aren’t working as designed, ensure that the opponent leaves the field after each series hoping that was their last. You can be the attacker or the attacked. Which one would you prefer?
  5. Hustle - “Leave everything you have on the field.” If what you’re doing isn’t working, make an adjustment and try harder. Nearly every college football team in the country would kill to have the level of talent assembled on the Notre Dame sideline. Yeah you’re a very young team. So what? Stretch yourself.
  6. Take Pride - Notre Dame Football is bigger than you. It’s bigger than me. The fans look to it for inspiration, meaning we look to you for inspiration. There’s over a hundred years of tradition that could either weigh on you or support you. Take pride in yourself, take pride in that tradition, take pride in your team.
  7. Win - It’s time.

That’s it. Nice and simple. Hit the guy in front of you. Keep hitting him until the whistle blows. Let the rest of the chips fall as they may.

We’re using fewer objectives this week than the previous weeks. And we’ll probably grade using a much more touchy-feely system than our usual “75% or better” approach. See you Sunday.

Related Posts:

HLS Expert Picks Week 4: This Time, We’re Gonna Get Something Right

“Insanity is doing the same thing [over and over] again and expecting a different result.” - Einstein, Football Savant

Not a ton of time this week for blogging, so this will be quick. Expect the quality, however, to be on par with past efforts.

Big Game: Notre Dame/MSU

Other Big Game: Georgia/Alabama

Not Really a Big Game, but We’re Gonna Watch: Washington/UCLA

Picks:

  • Sed: ND – 34, Alabama – 55, UCLA – 41, QB – ND
  • Sed’s Dog: ND – 45, Georgia – 45, Washington – 45, QB - Georgia
  • The Bear: MSU - 40, Alabama - 55, Washington - 33, QB - Alabama
  • DNeelan: ND - 42, Alabama - 29, UCLA - 38, QB - UCLA
  • Bad Kermit: ND - 35, Georgia - 54, UCLA - A million (all from UCLA); or 48, QB - UCLA
  • ChisND: ND - 45, Alabama - 79, Washington - 52,QB - Alabama
  • domer.mq: ND - 28, Georgia - 40, UCLA - 30, QB - Georgia
  • The Biscuit: ND - 34, Alabama - 46, UCLA - 40, QB - Alabama
Related Posts:

Friday Roundup: The “Open Letter To Zibby” Edition

Dear Zibby,

It’s time.  You know it.  I know it.  This team needs an emotional lift.  You were put on this earth to provide.

The action required is obvious; put someone in traction. And you know as well as I do that you don’t need to do anything dirty or illegal to make it happen.  Just use the gifts God gave you: a righteous nasty streak, pure, unadulterated speed, and the terrible ability to create a collision.

You already know all that.  Fate brings us together so that I may fulfill my small role in the greate scheme and provide you with a target: Jehuu Caulcrick

Mission Target

Good Luck,

HerLoyalSons.com

The Roundup:

Related Posts:

Demetrius Stands Up, domer.mq Considers Heading to Confession

I’ll admit, I was upset when Demetrius left.  Anyone who reads this site knows that.  I’m also disappointed that Demetrius isn’t still with the team.  He made a mistake in how he initially handled the situation.  He’s copped to that.  He’s also shown, in the last couple of days, why people think so highly of him.  I got upset and went nuts about it.  Can I blame that on Ty Willingham too?  Demetrius Jones, if by some weird happenstance you ever read HLS, you have my apologies.

“I’m going to root for those [Notre Dame] guys,” Jones said. “The only thing I regret is how I had to leave. [Notre Dame] let me go the best way they could, and that’s pretty fair to me.”

One person Jones does not want to see bashed, however, was Irish coach Charlie Weis.

“He made an impact on my life, how to be a family man, lots of things,” Jones said.”When we talked [this week], we had a healthy conversation. He was talking to me like a father, not just a coach. I admitted to him that if I’d come to him before the Michigan game, he would’ve talked me out of [leaving].

“No matter what happens down the line, my career started at Notre Dame, and that was because of coach Weis. I was a soldier in ‘Charlie’s Army,’ and I enjoyed every minute of it.”

I had really huge hopes for you at ND, Demetrius.  I hope you live up to them wherever you go.  Good luck.

Related Posts:

September 20, 2007

Dear Brian Cook, The Big Lead, The Wizard of Odds, and Most of the Mainstream Media,

GFY.

September 20, 2007 — University of Notre Dame athletics director Kevin White:

“Since learning of the situation surrounding the departure of Demetrius Jones on Friday, Sept. 14, the University of Notre Dame has been gathering facts to better assess his interest in transferring. Today, without formal confirmation of Demetrius’ status, we reached out to him to assist him and his family in ascertaining his athletic and academic future plans.

“We are helping Demetrius compile a list of prospective schools that are not on our immediate future football schedules. We will grant him a release to those schools, and we will assist him in settling at another institution as best we can. It’s our hope that Demetrius can enroll at an institution at which he might be able to receive a scholarship, possibly be eligible for the 2008 football season and, importantly, continue to make progress toward his degree without interruption.

“We have initiated our normal protocol by identifying a list of institutions to which he has an interest in transferring. While Demetrius did not consult us on his decision, the University and he are now working together in our customary fashion. Our hope is that this process assists him in finding an institution that will enable him to meet his goals both as a student and as an athlete.”

So much for the claims of Weis “throwing his weight around,” or being a “bully.” So much for the University of Notre Dame being some massive, vindictive beast.

So much for MGoBlog, TheBigLead.com, or The Wizard of Odds being anything but whores to the masters of advertising revenue and hair-pulling stories that generate that revenue despite a complete derth of talent or creativity. And in TheBigLead.com’s case, so much for being anything more than a micro-ESPN.

UPDATE: Brian Cook, of MGoBlog, also writes for AOL Sports’ FanHouse.  This is an excellent reason to never read anything from FanHouse.  Anyway, Brian has launched attack after attack at Notre Dame via his FanHouse blog over the Demetrius Jones issue. Brian has a particular vitriol for ND.  He just picked up on the press release by Kevin White as well.  About which he said…

ND would have been better served by just releasing the kid and letting the story die instead of appearing to screw over a kid who felt he was treated unfairly, but this is the same athletic department that’s hired Bob Davie, Tyrone Willingham, and Charlie Weis. They’re obviously not that bright.

Not that it needs saying, but Brian possesses the mental aptitude of a horse-fly.  If he actually took the time to read the press release, and still came to this conclusion, then he has the reading comprehension of a Michigan (sucks) football player.   But it seems highly unlikely that he was a Michigan (sucks) football player because word is he actually graduated from Michigan (sucks).

Let’s try to figure out the advanced calculus-like complexity of the situation for people like Brian.

Notre Dame has reached out to Demetrius twice in the last week.  The first instance occurred when Charlie Weis had to track him down just to get an explanation of what happened last Friday.  The second instance occurred, as stated in the press release, when Notre Dame contacted Demetrius today.  Hmmm.  Let’s think.  How does a university go about releasing a kid from a scholarship without that kid making any contact with the university in the first place?

That’s a rhetorical question, but, again, for people like Brian, we’ll explain.  This requires a little extrapolation, so we’re happy to hold Brian’s hand:  Notre Dame couldn’t release Demetrius without any contact.  They also couldn’t work with him to help him find a solution without contact.  So of course, as stated yesterday, they wouldn’t release Demetrius from his scholarship.

Related Posts:

HLS Expert Picks Week 3 Results: The “I’m Too Busy To Do This Properly” Edition

Sorta swamped for time this week. So here’s a table of the scoring for last week’s games. No sorting based on winners. I don’t have time for such complexity.

Looks like Bad Kermit is in the lead, still, but The Bear has made a huge comeback after an awful start to the season as well. How about sharing some of that karma with the boys in Gold and Blue, eh Bear?

Expert Notre Dame - 0
Michigan - 38
SoCal - 49
Nebraska -31
BC - 24
GaTech - 10
QB Bonus

BC
Week
Score
Total
Score
ChisND ND
35Winner - 0Score - +10
SoCal
53Winner - +10Score - 0
GT
38Winner - 0Score - +10
BC+10 40 105
Biscuit ND
34Winner - 0Score - +10
SoCal
61Winner - +10Score - 0
GT
38Winner - 0Score +10
SoCal0 30 110
DNeelan ND
36Winner - 0Score - +10
SoCal
54Winner - +10Score - 0
GT
45Winner - 0Score - 0
SoCal0 20 100
The Bear ND
33Winner - 0Score - +10
SoCal
45Winner - +10Score - 0
BC
70Winner - +10Score - 0
BC+10 40 130
Sed ND
41Winner - 0Score - +10
SoCal
55Winner - +10Score - 0
GT
52Winner - 0Score - 0
SoCal0 20 75
Sed’s Dog ND
45Winner - 0Score - +10
Nebraska
45Winner - 0Score - 0
BC
45Winner - +10Score - 0
Nebraska0 20 80
domer.mq ND
20Winner - 0Score - 0
SoCal
49Winner - +10Score - 0
GT
38Winner - 0Score - +10
SoCal0 20 55
Bad Kermit ND
27Winner - 0Score - 0
SoCal
42Winner - +10Score - 0
GT
54Winner - 0Score - 0
SoCal0 10 135

Related Posts:

Charlie Weis is Not the White House Press Secretary

In the world of press conferences and interviews, there are few people who actually very carefully measure their words so that they are sending the correct message out to interested parties. Traditionally, the White House Press Secretary is such a person. You might say the chairman of the Fed is such a person as well. Charlie Weis, head football coach of the University of Notre Dame is not such a person, and, as such, really couldn’t care less what you think of his words. He’s notoriously honest, but that doesn’t mean he’s, even for a moment, considering what he said 3 days ago versus what he’s saying today or tomorrow.

With that said, if you find yourself reading any of these quotes…

“That has been part of the problem this year — I try to be so creative, you don’t get good at anything,” Weis said. “Before I worry about creativity, we have to get good at something.”

“So today was the first day of the entire year that every play was ‘take ‘em to the ground.’ This lets the lines on both sides work on some kind of mentality, and focus on run and pass blocking, and tackling.”

“There’s a whole bunch of problems that are all involved right there. I think we’re going to be judged from where it goes from here. And let’s face it, it doesn’t get much lower than where you are right now.”

…or anything similar, and you’re trying to delineate anything beyond exactly what he said and meant at the moment that he said it,…

…or you’re name is Michael Rosenberg and you look like this…

An excellent example of a man who would have gained a lot if someone had just punched him in the face early in life.

…or you’re name is Brian Cook and you write MGoBlog…

Please remember, in the future, not to stand in the non-idiot line at all government offices, post offices, fast-food restaurants, and amusement parks. And if you could go ahead and let Darwinism just take hold, we’d all appreciate that too.

Thank you,

Management

HerLoyalSons.com

Related Posts:

« Previous Entries Next Entries »

Close
E-mail It