First, let's just absorb this for a moment. Because any Irish fan's thoughts on UCLA should be framed within the context of this...
Good. Everyone got Europe's finest work firmly implanted in their consciousness? Yes? Ok. Now that we're in this place together, we can continue...
The UCLA bruins suffered thru a year that, all else being equal, should have placed head coach Karl Dorrell on the hottest of seats after the 2006 season. In fact, watching the scene above in a live setting, one could almost feel Karl's "signature win" turn into "career terminator" over the course of a few minutes. But then Karl and the gang did the unthinkable, and went on to defeat then #2 Southern Cal in their cross-town rivalry game to end the season, and suddenly Karl's beginning to feel pretty comfy.
The real reason for optimism for UCLA in 2007 is their defensive coordinator, DeWayne Walker. He took a fairly miserable defensive group and turned them into an absolute power. In 2005, before Walker's tenure, the Bruins gave up 34.2 points a game. Last year they gave up just 19.9.
Offense: Return 10 starters. They also get a brand new offensive coordinator. What might get interesting is that both of the QBs that played in the starter role last year are back for more this year. The coaches will need to find a way to pick one guy and stick with him, though that should be helped if both guys can remain healthy thru the year.
Defense: Also returning 10 starters. This is a really solid group. Last year's defensive line recorded 40 sacks and allowed just 90 yards rushing per game. This year they lose All Nightmare Team Defensive End, Justin Hickman.
Special Teams: They lose a guy with an absolute monster leg, but then bring in a kid who's rumored to be even better. With the speed on the return teams, this group should be a real strength and help level some of the playing field against top competition, so long as their frosh kicker is as good as advertised.
Facts:
- When UCLA beat Southern Cal last year, it was the end of a 7 game win streak in the series for the Trojans. Prior to that, UCLA had won the last 8.
- Last year, UCLA lost to Washington. Consider that for a moment.
- The Bruins also managed to lose to FSU in the Emerald Bowl last year. The score? 27-44. In a game they led by 4 heading into the 4th.
HLS Top 25 Meta:
- Highest spot on a HLS Ballot: 2
- Lowest spot on a HLS Ballot: 15
- Average ranking on HLS Ballots: 8.5
Why Alex Trebek Loves Them:
- A "Bruin" is a large, ferocious bear. The term apparently originated in a story called "Reynard the Fox."
Around the Web:
HLS Tracker 10 Forecast Technology Says:
Wait and see. Their early schedule is Stanford, BYU, Utah, and Washington. If they tear thru that like The Shark thru a Bruin Backfield with less than a minute to go, then look out. Here come the Bruins. But if they struggle even a little bit, and I mean they win all 4 games but with an average margin of under 10, then I'd look for Karl Dorrell's head on the chopping block come Christmas.
By Mick August 28, 2007 - 2:33 pm
Gee, I wonder who put UCLA #2 on their ballot?
I realize you went to grad school there, but let’s try and be objective here. This is like Spurrier voting Duke on every pre-season coaches poll.
In the interest of full disclosure, can we see the completed ballots for all of the HLS team members? Then someone at Blue Gray Sky would be able to do an analysis showing the different amounts of bias between each of you and show you why your whole damn system is corrupt.
Thumbs Up/Down:
0
0
By The Biscuit August 28, 2007 - 6:00 pm
My methodology was impeccable and it’s complete coincidence that they ended up so high AND that I went there for grad school. I never have nor will support UCLA football in any way. If anything, I am completely neutral on them. I will have been to 2 games when I go to the ND game to support the Irish against the Bruins, and the first was a drunken tailgating mess where no one watched the game.
My methodology included a weighted average of 1) My Quality Rating, 2) Media Opinion (average ranking end of last season), 3) Whether Being Good will Help ND 4) Level of Hate and 5) Hotness of Cheerleaders. Seriously, I did a weighted average that included Hotness of Cheerleader. We’re objective, but no one said we’re logical.
There were 7 teams I ranked higher than UCLA in my own personal opinion, but the media was hot on them, it’ll help ND if they win a lot, and their cheerleaders are smoking. The only place where my rating system really helped them was the hatred factor. Where USC was a 1 (meaning I despise them) and ND a 10, UCLA got an average-at-best 6, which means I’m neutral, maybe slightly positive.
How’s that for full disclosure, biz-natch???
Plus, that’s why we did a combined ranking, to eliminate those biases (even if they’re not there). I bet you believe in Area 51 and the Grassy Knoll too. The magic bullet theory works!!!
Thumbs Up/Down:
0
0
By Bad Kermit August 28, 2007 - 6:43 pm
In the interest of full disclosure, I am the least-homer member of the “expert” panel. There, I said it.
Thumbs Up/Down:
0
0
By The Biscuit August 29, 2007 - 2:35 am
You’re also the least male, but we don’t publicize that, do we?
Oops.
Thumbs Up/Down:
0
0