Comments on: Point Made on Relative Reporting: Evidence Ivan Maisel ESPN http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/ Just a few guys loving the same woman and talking Irish Football. Tue, 06 Jan 2009 10:13:57 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: domer.mq http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-454 domer.mq Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:28:18 +0000 http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-454 Did they say they went into safe mode? I suppose it'll all come down to "Those who dare, win." However, did you see how many stupid, stupid ways Nebraska played that game? UCLA may have been overly safe, but that's certainly more competitive than overly stupid. Did they say they went into safe mode?

I suppose it’ll all come down to “Those who dare, win.”

However, did you see how many stupid, stupid ways Nebraska played that game?

UCLA may have been overly safe, but that’s certainly more competitive than overly stupid.

]]> By: The Biscuit http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-453 The Biscuit Thu, 26 Oct 2006 02:01:45 +0000 http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-453 But they did go into 'safe' mode, which is playing to not lose rather than to win, yes? But they did go into ’safe’ mode, which is playing to not lose rather than to win, yes?

]]> By: domer.mq http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-446 domer.mq Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:16:37 +0000 http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-446 I don't agree with that view on UCLA. UCLA played things "by the book." Had they managed to run for a 1st down against a defense that, frankly, hadn't shown they could stop the run very effectively thru the rest of the season, we'd be having a much different conversation. Nebraska, on the other hand, fumbled the ball away. I don’t agree with that view on UCLA. UCLA played things “by the book.” Had they managed to run for a 1st down against a defense that, frankly, hadn’t shown they could stop the run very effectively thru the rest of the season, we’d be having a much different conversation.

Nebraska, on the other hand, fumbled the ball away.

]]> By: The Biscuit http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-445 The Biscuit Wed, 25 Oct 2006 22:11:56 +0000 http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-445 Kinda like UCLA. And I don't mind if someone says that for both games. But it's gotta be BOTH. Sl-ores. Kinda like UCLA. And I don’t mind if someone says that for both games. But it’s gotta be BOTH. Sl-ores.

]]> By: domer.mq http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-444 domer.mq Wed, 25 Oct 2006 21:41:31 +0000 http://www.herloyalsons.com/blog/2006/10/25/point-made-on-relative-reporting-evidence-ivan-maisel-espn/#comment-444 Ivan forgets that it was less Texas knowing how to win, and Nebraska having no clue. Ivan forgets that it was less Texas knowing how to win, and Nebraska having no clue.

]]>